Joint Statement from the USC Center for the Political Future, ABC7/KABC-TV Los Angeles and Univision: 

As we lead up to Tuesday’s California gubernatorial debate, we want to be clear that we categorically, unequivocally deny any allegations that the debate criteria was in any way biased in favor or against any candidate and want to clarify the facts.

The general parameters for this debate were set last year when candidates were notified that a debate would take place with the top performing candidates.  

At the request of USC’s Center for the Political Future, Professor of Political Science and Public Policy Christian Grose independently developed the data-driven methodology to rank candidates’ viability for the debate. The methodology was based on well-established metrics consistent with formulas widely used to set debate participation nationwide — a combination of polling and fundraising — and developed without regard to any particular candidate. No one in the USC administration or at the Center for the Political Future, ABC7/KABC-TV Los Angeles or Univision influenced its development or the implementation of the methodology.

Professor Grose is one of the most respected scholars in the field of elections and political science. He is regularly called upon by nonpartisan and independent organizations to provide data analysis and objective analysis, including by serving as an expert witness in cases on election law. He has explained his methodology at length to journalists and published it here to ensure transparency. We have reviewed his research extensively and see no legitimate reason to question its credibility. 

All of the candidates in the race have served this state with honor and distinction. We understand the frustration of those who aren’t included and have sought to address their questions directly. Professor Grose has explained his formula to the candidates and to the media. We have had in-depth discussions about expanding the debate’s format; however, there is a significant gap between the top six candidates and the seventh, eighth and ninth placed candidates. It simply would not be fair or feasible to invite every candidate in such a crowded field. This is consistent with a debate held in February with seven candidates and a debate next month with five candidates announced, all of which are participating in our debate.

This debate — which features six candidates —represents a snapshot of where the California race currently stands after months of campaigning, significant media coverage of all candidates, and at least one other debate. If we were to change the composition of the debate participants at this stage, we would be doing the very thing these candidates are accusing us of doing by unfairly influencing the criteria to reach a pre-determined outcome. We respect the process, are committed to a straightforward, objective approach, and look forward to hosting a meaningful conversation on the issues of the greatest importance to voters this election season. 

All of the co-hosts will continue to be engaged in the gubernatorial race and use their platforms to help educate voters. The Center for the Political Future is inviting all candidates to sit down with them for interviews which the Center will post on their website for voters to view. ABC7/KABC-TV Los Angeles and Univision have committed to continuing their coverage of the candidates on their platforms.